A Pragmatic Classification Framework for AI Incident Monitoring
Authors
AI Governance Taskforce
Winter 2026
Paper accepted to Technical AI Governance Research workshop at ICML 2026
Public AI incident database counts conflate changes in reporting propensity, deployment growth, and shifts in harm frequency per unit of exposure. These issues introduce significant uncertainties challenging public and corporate policy frameworks centred on realized risks.
We propose a simple framework that establishes clear points of inquiry, separately estimates exposure from harm-rate trends, and then classifies into meaningful trajectory categories for governance decisions.
The framework combines a structured monitoring question format (SORT) to clarify coverage decisions, a tiered estimation procedure calibrated to available evidence, and LLM-assisted incident matching against public databases.
Applied to various monitoring questions, we draw conclusions regarding the monitoring ecosystem more broadly: Providing an essential interpretative classification, determining what can and cannot be claimed, and establishing that exposure estimation is required as AI deployments become increasingly common.
Supporting experts: Peter Slattery and Simon Mylius (MIT AI Risk Initiative)
Programme
AI Governance Taskforce
The AI Governance Taskforce is a career development programme for experienced professionals looking to transition careers into AI governance, focussed on reducing risks from advanced AI.
Participants work around existing commitments during our 12 week, remote, part-time cohorts, producing policy research in teams of 4, led by our Research Team Lead staff in partnership with recognised experts in the field. Teams write an academic-style paper and accompanying blog post to build knowledge, skills and work portfolios.



